This is a sketch of everything. It has been proposed by many scientists that the shape of the planet is not a sphere or spheroid. That it is actually toroidal, as the magnetic field field that the world generates (or according to some generates the world) it a toroid shape. All processes or cycles on the planet exist in a flow that follows a toroid shape. Here is a sketch of just the planet: 

Of course this is just the magnetic field. Science currently calls this the magnetosphere. Science skipped the work of introducing active toroidal models to a field dominated by static spherical models, and simply called the earth's toroid shaped magnetic field a "magneto" "sphere" and killed all statement accuracy on the subject for the era.

I made a quick single pole sketch of the Earth and the field. 

There were a couple pictures that came from Voyager last month that had tiny little magnetic fields.

Nasa was intent on calling them "magnetic bubbles" furthering the misconception of magnetic fields as spheres and implying they are subject to surface tension.That charachterization made me wonder how in the hell NASA invented an ion drive if they dont even know how to accurately represent a magnetic field. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbJiY1wATQ I decided that science pr was probably to blame and moved on to the data:

After revisioning the heliosheath in my mind I realized that the Sun was a vector field of toroid waveform oscillation. The artifacts at the edge of the heliosheath are not from our sun, but rather, they are the interstellar ether, collected at the bowshock, pushed into toroidal form, by a giant toroidal waveform oscillation that they are riding around the galaxy. A glimpse of the field between energy and what we percieve of as matter.

I began to consider it without time as a constant and visualized everything that ever existed and ever would exist existing simutlaneously. As a vector field of toroidal field oscillations, no moment would ever be the same as any other moment as they are all in what we percieve as motion. Oscillating at different frequencies, without the concept of a moving event horizon that we call "time" they are simply occupying their particular location in spacetime.

From that perspective I examined the concept of "big bang" and dropped it entirely as it was not possible for nothing to be. <-that's proper english. It is not possible for any waveform oscillation to have no relative earlier waveform. Just as one block stacks up on another and no block is at the bottom sitting on nothing, so the existence of the universe in spacetime follows the same pattern. With every oscillation of the field a descendant of the oscillation of the field. I decided to visualize the sun again and when I saw it, it was beautiful, all of human history, our tiny little moment, on this beautiful mass of water and earth stretching out around the sun. It looked so whole. Like a single one drop of water on the sun, a swirling shape in spacetime.

The piece titled "The History of All Earth Ever, As A Drop of Water on The Sun" I admit is a pale representation of what I see in my imagination when I conceptualize the Earth's relationship with the Sun, but it is as accurate as we know today. In time I will hopefully be able to prove that it is the most beautiful and accurate perspective for depicting our home in the universe. Much more capable of peace and understanding than portraying our home in a bunch of mysteriously connected sphere bubles floating in the blackness of nothing after a mysterious bang. 

Posted via email from The Sid Gabriel Post